🔗 Share this article

In today's Britain, protest has ceased to be a fundamental right. Rather, it has become a privilege that authorities grant or withhold at their discretion. This constitutes the underlying meaning of proposed measures that the current government is putting forward, which would dictate the timing and location demonstrations can take place, with possible imprisonment for those who defy these limitations.

Gradual Weakening of Democratic Rights

Previous governments had already undermined this fundamental freedom: the former Conservative government had given law enforcement extensive new authorities, which international human rights organizations had censured as "serious and unjustified restrictions" on democratic freedoms. Collectively, these incremental attacks on freedom have practically abolished the hard-won right to freedom of protest.

Using Tragedy to Rationalize Crackdown

The latest limitations are being defended by citing last week's terrible anti-Jewish attack on a British Islamic center. There should be universal agreement that the safety of Jewish communities in Britain must be safeguarded. However, using this atrocity as a justification to stifle dissent is not only disconnected to that responsibility but perverts it.

"When you cannot set boundaries at mass killing, you likely can't establish limits at democracy," observed a well-known American author, a statement that rings true for the present administration.

Historical Context of Demonstration

Reflect on Britain's long tradition of public demonstration and activism against racism and fascism, from the 1936 Battle of Cable Street to after World War II Jewish anti-fascist movements and the 1970s mobilizations against the National Front. Many of these historical demonstrators were branded as radicals in their era, even while they were fighting for the rights of marginalized groups.

Present Situation

In today's complicated landscape, here's what's truly happening: Israel – a sovereign nation – is perpetrating acts that international bodies have characterized as systematic destruction. Its military actions have prompted the global justice body to release legal indictments against Benjamin Netanyahu and his ex-military leader.

International public opinion has shifted dramatically against Israel's violent actions. In Britain, a substantial majority of the public think Israel has likely committed war crimes. Most people would support a total prohibition on weapons exports to the state, and back the detention of the Israeli leader.

Suppressing Opposition

Having essentially failed the argument, pro-Israel advocates are now seizing on a vile anti-Jewish attack to try to silence a popular campaign against a moral catastrophe. The British government seems involved in this attempt. Government officials have not enacted comprehensive sanctions on Israel and have allowed weapon shipments to proceed.

People who are demonstrating against the destruction of Gaza have been characterized as dangerous radicals. Yet there's a important factor why there hasn't been a broader crackdown on these demonstrators until now: extremely few protesters have made genuinely hateful statements about Jewish people, giving police authorities little justification to intervene.

Dangerous Conflation

Merging Jewish heritage with the actions of the Israeli state is not only cynical but also dangerous. The official definition of antisemitism, accepted by the British government and many organizations, has been rightly questioned for potentially restricting valid commentary of Israel. However, there should be universal agreement about one of its key examples: that "making Jewish people generally accountable for decisions of the state of Israel" constitutes antisemitism.

Escalating Restrictions

This is why we've arrived at a situation where police authorities can propose that protests criticizing Israel's policies should be called off because they might "inadvertently or intentionally" endorse anti-Jewish sentiment. Similarly, government officials have declared that recognition of Palestine as a nation has made political parties "complicit" in alleged abuse faced by British Jews.

Double Standards

On the same day as the religious center assault, the Israeli military killed numerous of Palestinian civilians in Gaza – adding to the terrible count from 24 months of ongoing violence that have claimed many thousands of lives. British political leaders and media outlets have hardly hidden the minimal importance they assign to Palestinian existence. This represents one of the boldest expressions of racism in our time.

Breaking Boundaries

Our government has already crossed a dangerous boundary by proscribing Palestine Action, a peaceful, human rights-focused activist collective. Multiple thousands of British demonstrators have been detained, mostly for carrying placards opposing mass killing and endorsing the banned organization. Many of those detained are elderly citizens; among them a retired priest and the child of a Holocaust survivor.

Global Comparisons

It's not difficult to see where this trajectory leads. In the United States, political leaders helped demonize demonstrations supporting Palestine: a ex-political leader suggested that some were "linked with" other nations, while the current president described such protests as anti-Jewish. In taking these actions, they helped legitimize the repressive measures on such demonstrations – and on freedom of expression in general.

Future Concerns

If a hard-right government comes to power, it would be granted extensive authority to suppress opposition. What might a Reform government do with this restrictive framework? Our ancestors fought, suffered and sacrificed their lives to secure our freedoms. We may ultimately regret how easily we allowed them to slip away.